It's also no secret that I'm not nuts about the live-action remakes they've been cranking out lately, and will most likely crank out for years to come.
And why wouldn't they? They've got a good thing going! These movies are bringing in a shipload of money, and folks are always so eager to see how real life compares to the cartoon.
It's like a reincarnation of the Disney Renaissance.
I totally get it: you need money to keep your company alive and well.
Sometimes (as much as I hate to say this) you must sacrifice a bit of artistic integrity if it brings in the dough. Look at Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey: it's (almost) universally agreed that the books are among the worst-written in the world, but look how many copies the authors have sold. I could pay off my medical insurance for the entire year, and pay all of my college debts in full, with less than half that much.
She and I agreed that we can only take so many stories; we only want so much information on each individual character, and the light saber duels and Apocalyptic explosions can only provide so much eye candy.
I'll admit it: at least a couple of these remakes from Disney have perked my interest and I figured it couldn't hurt to watch them at least once. When Beauty and the Beast came out, I wanted to check it out mostly because of Emma Watson and Ian McKellen, and I really wanted to see how they would design the Beast.
Even the songs weren't so different, besides "Evermore" and "How Does a Moment Last Forever." It was just different voices singing the same words.
While it never was one of my favorite movies to begin with, I still say the 1991 cartoon was better.
Although I understand the business part of all these remakes, I also have to admit, they rub me the wrong way as an artist. It puts a sour taste in my mouth to see them recycle one movie after another, to the point where the original movies are starting to lose their magic. They're cheapening what made those cartoons so special to us in our childhood.
I also don't appreciate what they've done to the characters, such as making the Grand Duke and King Stefan the bad guys (and Maleficent a tragic victim), or making LeFou more romantically interested in Gaston, or making Kaa a girl just because that story is "too male-oriented." (Give me a break.)
Like the saying goes, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Yet the guys at Disney have taken it upon themselves to "fix" all of our beloved classics...which isn't necessarily a crime, but feels quite unnecessary all the same.
But you know what I hate the most?
Every time a live-action remake comes out, we have to deal with all these nutty "Disney purists" raising absolute hell over how the remake "should" or "shouldn't" be done.
It has been confirmed that Will Smith will play the Genie, and people are acting like the movie is already ruined (and that their entire childhood has been blown to kingdom come) just because Will Smith couldn't possibly hold a candle to Robin Williams.
Will Smith is not Robin Williams. Will Smith is Will Smith, and Will Smith is going to do this Will Smith's way, not Robin Williams's way.
If you don't like it, then pray tell, who would do a better job? How would you do it?
When you're in charge of the movie, you call the shots. And when you're not in charge, you take what you get.
And with The Lion King just around the corner, and that being one of Disney's biggest hits, I've a unpleasant feeling we're in for our bumpiest ride with the purists yet.
In the words of good ol' Charlie Brown:
No story can drag on forever.
No story should have to drag on forever, even for the sake of money.
Sooner or later, you will have to officially write the words "THE END"--and stick with them.
Screencaps courtesy of Animation Screencaps
No comments:
Post a Comment